Education
- Stanford Law School, J.D. (2018)
- Rice University, summa cum laude, B.A. (2015)
Clerkships
- The Honorable Gary Feinerman
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - The Honorable Patricia A. Millett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Admissions
- California
- District of Columbia
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Brian Baran is an appellate and trial lawyer in Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP’s Washington, D.C. office. He focuses on critical motions and appeals across a variety of matters, including complex commercial, intellectual property, and energy litigation. Brian enjoys distilling thorny legal and technological issues into clear, persuasive written and oral advocacy for his clients.
Recognized as a Rising Star of the Plaintiffs Bar by The National Law Journal, Brian’s appellate experience includes arguments and merits briefing in the Second, Ninth, and Federal Circuits in federal preemption disputes, pro bono immigration and prisoners’ rights matters, and patent litigation. He has also handled cert-stage briefing in the U.S. Supreme Court. But trial court is where winning records are made, and so Brian has litigated a wide range of issues in federal and state trial courts alike, including requests for preliminary injunctive relief, discovery disputes, dispositive and Daubert motions, and pre- and post-trial motions.
Brian is committed to giving back to the community through a robust pro bono practice, including representing an asylum seeker at the Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit, and Board of Immigration Appeals, along with representing California state prisoners challenging unconstitutional sleep deprivation in federal district court and on appeal.
Before joining the firm, Brian clerked for the Honorable Gary Feinerman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and then for the Honorable Patricia A. Millett of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Brian earned his J.D. from Stanford Law School, where he was named the Nathan Abbott Scholar (highest cumulative grade score) and graduated with Pro Bono Distinction. As a member of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, he worked to protect voting rights and the rights of the accused in cases at the certiorari and merits stages. Brian also served as a managing editor of the Stanford Law Review. Brian and his partner in the Kirkwood Moot Court competition finished as semifinalists and won the award for best respondents’ brief.
Brian graduated summa cum laude from Rice University with a B.A. in philosophy and sociology and a minor in business. He was awarded Distinction in Research and Creative Works and inducted into Phi Beta Kappa. Brian’s peers selected him for the Rice University Service Award in memory of Dean Hugh Scott Cameron for his service to the student body.
Representative Matters
Representing plaintiffs in district court and on appeal in cases seeking to enforce federal preemption under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act following a precedent-setting victory in the Ninth Circuit.
Argued and helped brief the California Restaurant Association’s Ninth Circuit appeal in its challenge to the City of Berkeley’s gas ban, leading to a landmark victory in which a unanimous panel reversed the district court and held that Berkeley’s ban is preempted by EPCA. The RJLF team’s victory was acknowledged as the runner-up for The AmLaw Litigation Daily’s “Litigator of the Week” and has been publicized in national news sources including The New York Times, Bloomberg, Reuters, and The Wall Street Journal.
Argued and briefed pending Second Circuit appeals on behalf of coalitions of businesses, trade associations, and labor unions challenging the New York State and New York City gas bans. Also represented the plaintiffs throughout the underlying proceedings in the Northern and Southern Districts of New York.
Argued and briefed a Ninth Circuit appeal on behalf of a coalition of businesses, trade associations, and labor unions challenging a South Coast Air Quality Management District rule effectively banning gas water heaters and other appliances. Also briefed dispositive motions in the Central District of California.
Secured a total award of $673 million for Kove IO against Amazon Web Services in a patent infringement case involving foundational cloud storage technology. The trial court upheld a $525 million jury verdict and added $148 million in interest. The win was the top patent verdict of 2024, ranked among the decade's top 10, earned Law360’s Legal Lions of the Week twice, and helped the firm secure Law360’s 2024 IP Practice Group of the Year.
In the district court, played a key role in briefing before, during, and after trial, including summary judgment, evidentiary, and post-trial motions.
At the Federal Circuit, managing Kove’s ongoing defense of the verdict, including a crucial role in Kove’s briefing.
Representing VideoLabs in patent litigation regarding foundational video technologies against multiple Fortune 500 companies, including a series of Federal Circuit appeals arising out of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings.
Representing Broadcom in patent litigation against Netflix over video streaming technology involving hundreds of millions of dollars in potential damages, including a Federal Circuit appeal presenting §101 patent eligibility issues and ongoing proceedings in the Northern District of California.
Represented Dawgs in its successful opposition to certiorari on a Lanham Act issue, preserving Dawgs’ win at the Federal Circuit.
Helped achieve an $84 million willful patent infringement verdict on behalf of Cirba, Inc. (d/b/a Densify) against tech giant VMware, Inc. Following a five-day jury trial in the District of Delaware, the jury ruled—in only two hours—that VMware willfully infringed on cutting-edge Cirba’s virtualization technology. The win earned The AmLaw Litigation Daily’s “Litigator of the Week” shoutout. Tasked with critical briefing, including preliminary injunction, dispositive, Daubert, and pre- and post-trial motions; deposition discovery; and litigating Federal Circuit appeals arising out of district court and Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings.
Represented Alcoa USA Corporation in successfully fending off temporary injunction and damages litigation brought by Luminant Generation Company stemming from the parties’ complex contractual relationship at a 30,000-acre industrial site in Rockdale, Texas.
Represented Droplets in patent litigation against Yahoo! (now Altaba) and Nordstrom in the Northern District of California and Federal Circuit, as well as in Altaba’s dissolution proceedings in Delaware Chancery Court.
Pro Bono Service
Representing an applicant for asylum in a habeas petition seeking release from arbitrary and prolonged detention in the Eastern District of New York.
Represented an applicant for asylum in a petition for review at the Ninth Circuit and a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court raising important jurisdictional issues, as well as in a bond appeal at the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Represented California state prisoners in § 1983 litigation challenging unconstitutional sleep deprivation in the Eastern District of California and on appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
Rankings & Awards
The National Law Journal, Elite Trial Lawyers: Rising Star of the Plaintiffs Bar (2024)
Managing IP, IP Patent Disputes (Northeast) Firm of the Year 2025
Managing IP, Impact Case of the Year: Kove Win, 2025
Law360, Legal Lions of the Week, April and August 2024
Law360, IP Practice Group of the Year 2024
Stanford Law School: Nathan Abbott Scholar; Urban A. Sontheimer First-Year Honor; Pro Bono Distinction; Kirkwood Moot Court Competition, Semifinalist & Best Respondents’ Brief
Rice University: Distinction in Research & Creative Works; Rice University Service Award in memory of Dean Hugh Scott Cameron; Student Association Outstanding Senior Award
Publications
“Comment on the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley,” co-author, The Source (Winter 2023)
“Comment on the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley,” co-author, AGA Annual Legal Forum (July 2023)
“Addressing Stranded Assets for Natural Gas Utilities,” co-author, AGA Annual Legal Forum (July 2022)
Mainstream Jurisprudence and Some First Amendment Problems: Judge Neil M. Gorsuch on Free Expression, 69 STAN. L. REV. ONLINE 109 (2017) (with Nathaniel Rubin)